1. Study design and ethics approval
- COPE emphasizes the importance of well-planned, ethically approved research.
- A research protocol should be developed and adhered to, with roles clearly defined by all team members.
- Research should aim to answer specific questions, not just collect data.
- Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee approval is crucial for studies involving people, medical records, and anonymised human tissues.
- Research proposals should address potential ethical issues, especially for vulnerable subjects.
- Patient information sheets should be provided during recruitment, detailing objectives, procedures, benefits, harms, and rights to refuse participation.
- Consent should be obtained from subjects or guardians, and confidentiality of information should be ensured.
2. Data Analysis in Research
- Researchers must appropriately analyze data to avoid misconduct.
- Intentional omission of results can lead to misinterpretation and mislead.
- Fabrication and falsification of data are considered misconduct.
- Under-reporting negative research findings is common due to pressure from the pharmaceutical industry.
- Full disclosure of all data sources and methods is crucial for appropriate data analysis.
- Discussion sections should address bias issues and explain how they were addressed in the study's design and interpretation.
3. Authorship Definition and Importance
- No universally agreed definition of authorship.
- Authors should have made substantial contributions to the intellectual content.
- Authors should conceptualize, design, acquire, analyze, and interpret data.
- Authors should certify the manuscript's validity and take public responsibility.
- Authors usually draft or revise the manuscript and approve the submitted one.
- Data collection, grammar, and language editing do not deserve authorship.
- Early decision-making is crucial in research planning.
- The "Advice to Authors" of the target journal can guide authorship issues.
4. Conflicts of Interest in Research
- Conflicts of interest can influence researchers' judgments on published work.
- These conflicts can be personal, commercial, political, academic, or financial.
- Financial interests can include employment, research funding, stock ownership, payment for travel, consultancies, and company support.
- These conflicts should be discussed early in the research process.
- Researchers should consult an independent researcher or Ethics Committee if doubts arise.
- Conflicts of interest should be declared to editors during publication.
5. Redundant Publication and Plagiarism in Research
Redundant Publication:
- Involves two or more papers sharing the same hypothesis, data, discussion points, or conclusions without full cross-referencing.
- Previous publication does not preclude subsequent submission, but full disclosure is required.
- Self-plagiarism is a growing issue in a competitive environment influencing appointments, promotions, and grant applications.
Plagiarism:
- Ranges from unreferenced use of others' published ideas to submission under "new" authorship.
- It's crucial to disclose all sources of information and seek permission for large amounts of other people's materials.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.